When people think The Romantics they probably think of the songs Talking In Your Sleep or What I Like About You. Both songs are good, but they are not my favorite Romantics song. And if it had not been for Mtv I would not have known this song existed.
Monday, September 5, 2011
Saturday, September 3, 2011
Retcon Job
This past week has proven to be pretty interesting in regards to continuity. On the one hand, DC Comics has ceased the run on all their comics in order to more or less reboot the DCU with 52 new issues in an attempt to boost sales. Histories have been re-written, the status quo shaken up...again. Now, I say "more or less" because while some characters are getting a fresh start, the better selling titles like Green Lantern and Batman Incorporated are going to be largely untouched despite massive holes in logic...which seems par for the course as the first time DC did a shake this big it was also done in a typically half-assed fashion.
It will be interesting to see if this daring (uncharitable readers might use the word "desperate") move on the part of DC VP Dan Didio will work or not. Me, I will buy some of the comics, give the experiment a chance, and I hope it works because I do want to see DC succeed in the dwindling comic market.
The other piece of news-and this one makes me cringe-is George Lucas releasing the original Star Wars trilogy on Blu Ray...and making yet more changes. The most damning, unforgivable one to me is changing Darth Vader's climactic scene. It is evidence of George Lucas being surrounded by yes men who are unable and/or unwilling to tell him when he is doing something creatively bankrupt and when he is alienating the fans that made him filthy rich.
I could post a ten thousand word rant about the subject of George Lucas, but there are other places online for that sort of thing. I only mention it here because of the symmetry we are seeing between the Star Wars and DC franchises, on retooling properties that may or may not need it (I recognize the potential need to tweak the Star Wars movies for the high definition format. I just disagree with the tweaks George has chosen to make.)
These changes are known as "retcons", a shortening of "retroactive continuity". Now, you may ask, if I am not going to rant about Dan Didio and George Lucas, why do I bring up retcons at all? Well, you may wish to do one in your game.
This is not something you should consider lightly. A retcon should never be attempted unless it is absolutely necessary. A retcon involves editing or adding to a game's history and that is to me a very, very big deal.
There are different kinds of retcons. The least damaging is one where history is added to without contradicting known information. An excellent example of this where comics are concerned was a Spider Man story written by professional wrestler Raven. He penned a story about the wrestler Peter Parker had defeated that fateful night when his Uncle Ben had been murdered (I have not read the story but have been told it is a great read.). Nothing in the story contradicts what was written before. An excellent example of this where my Vindicators game is concerned was his post my fellow GM Rafe composed concerning vampires, and not the sparkling kind.
He had in mind the idea to employ a little used, all but forgotten character called The Ace of Spades. In one great post he turned this character from a punchline into someone menacing, hinting at a deep back story. And he did it without contradicting what we knew of Ace or any of his in-game actions.
Another example of retconning is the alteration of known game facts, but said facts do not impact the game as a whole. In my games there was an organization known as the Six Families, magical clans. One of them was called the Fong-Kabayama. It was a lame name but at the time I did not see it as a high priority. It was an Asian clan and I did not have any immediate plans to use them, it existed for the purposes of fleshing out the game world. Only now I am running a new game, Behind The Veil, and it involves the magical community in a broader way and "Fong-Kabayama" simply does not cut it. So I changed the clan name to Golden Dragon and added more information without altering the information that had already been posted. It was a harmless alteration, it changed no past events.
Now we come to the sorts of retcons that make major alterations to the histories of properties. Excellent examples of this can be seen in Star Trek, The Next Generation, where the Klingons started out as joining the Federation, then later on writers decided to make the Klingons a separate empire again (A note: my friend, Dave Zyn, thought Star Trek producers Berman and Braga missed an excellent opportunity during the Enterprise television series. The show's primary subplot concerned a "temporal cold war", a conflict taking place between rival time travelers. Dave suggested every retcon seen in Star Trek could have been ascribed to the temporal cold war, where one side or the other was messing with the timeline to suit their purposes. Sadly Berman and Braga were pretty much just cashing a check at that point and did not seem interested in generating compelling storytelling or paying attention to inconvenient literary gaps in logic.). Another example is where a character has been killed but another writer brings them back (Sadly, Marvel and DC Comics both have been guilty of this on what is by now probably a hundred occasions.). It is these sorts of retcons that you have to be very careful of.
Sometimes a retcon may seem necessary, especially where real world events may impact your game. For example, author John Ringo has written a series of books about a retired Navy SEAL who killed Osama Bin Laden and collected the reward. Only now Osama Bin Laden is dead for real. So if John Ringo wishes to continue writing that series of books he is going to have to address real world events; either he says his character is still Bin Laden's killer (which in my opinion is disrespectful to the men who really did take him down) , or he says the man his character killed was someone else. So what we are seeing is how a real world event impacts a work of fiction.
So it might be necessary to tweak your game a bit if modern real world events impact a game that takes place in the future. However you can usually find that most events can simply be ignored where your game is concerned. Ten years on, 9/11 is just one more tragedy in a long, long line to most people not directly impacted by it, and in another ten years there will be a generation it hardly affected at all. No one ever talks about the Oklahoma City bombings any more, Timothy McVey is almost wholly unknown to anyone not living there or in Michigan. Same goes for the tragedies in Waco or Columbine. So for simplicity's sake, most modern events can be ignored. At worst you can simply say your game is taking place in an alternate timeline where it did not happen. After all, the Eugenics Wars never happened during the late twentieth century and that never stopped me from enjoying Star Trek re-runs. But perhaps you feel it necessary to incorporate real world events into your setting. If so do try to do so with a modicum of tact, if anything to spare the feelings of those who may have touched by the tragedies. Try not to exploit them.
So it might not be necessary to incorporate real world events into your game. What other reasons might a retcon be necessary? Perhaps there was a player meltdown and someone has quit. The break up was so acrimonious you want to wipe any trace of this player's character from your game. And let's say there has been a player involved in the game since the beginning, or at least years. And the two of you have had an epic falling out. Words were exchanged that cannot be taken back. He or she has gone, but he or she has left behind hundreds and hundreds of posts. So, what do you do?
Nothing. Nothing at all. He or she is gone, suck it up. Doesn't matter who was right or who was wrong. For the good of the game you accept the fact their contribution is there to stay, write their characters out in a fair and realistic manner, and then you move on. You do not pretend their character did not exist, you do not murder their character in some humiliating fashion. You do not write some massive vindictive post where a time traveler murders his character in his crib. Find a way to logically write their character out of the game, be mature about it. But for God's sake do not retcon them from existence!
So now let's say you have a great idea for an adventure, but the only problem is this pesky event happened five years ago that is in the way. So you have to ask yourself these questions: Is this really the only way you can accomplish the story you have in mind? How important is the event in question to the players? What are the long term consequences to your game's integrity? If any of these three questions give you pause, do not do the retcon!
If it seems that I am against major retcons you are right. I am against introducing new characters that are written as if they had always been. I am against extensive re-writes of canon history. I am against bringing dead characters back to life regardless of how much I like them. Greg Rucka may have written some great Captain America stories with Bucky not dying in that rocket crash, but at the cost of destroying a key component of Captain America's origin. Rucka creating a third Summers brother in X-Men, an entire team of X-Men no one ever heard of before? Pardon my french, but I call bullshit on that.
Now, that being said, I am not against a perceived retcon. In these cases it appears you have made dramatic changes but in reality it is not the case. For example, in my game Paragon died. What if Paragon resurfaces? Is it truly Paragon or an imposter? Is it Paragon from a parallel universe? What we can have here is a mystery the PCs need to solve.
Or is it Paragon time traveling a day before he dies? What are the implications if the PCs talk him out of going back? What we could see there is a possible retcon based on the actions of the PCs and even a potential Flashpoint (Warning: Spoilers!) situation. Still, I would be very, very careful before
So when it comes to retcons, think twice. If it is a minor thing then there is no harm. But if the consequences are potentially game wrecking, well, play it safe and don't pull a Lucas.
It will be interesting to see if this daring (uncharitable readers might use the word "desperate") move on the part of DC VP Dan Didio will work or not. Me, I will buy some of the comics, give the experiment a chance, and I hope it works because I do want to see DC succeed in the dwindling comic market.
 |
| I must admit, the man does rock a bald dome. |
The other piece of news-and this one makes me cringe-is George Lucas releasing the original Star Wars trilogy on Blu Ray...and making yet more changes. The most damning, unforgivable one to me is changing Darth Vader's climactic scene. It is evidence of George Lucas being surrounded by yes men who are unable and/or unwilling to tell him when he is doing something creatively bankrupt and when he is alienating the fans that made him filthy rich.
I could post a ten thousand word rant about the subject of George Lucas, but there are other places online for that sort of thing. I only mention it here because of the symmetry we are seeing between the Star Wars and DC franchises, on retooling properties that may or may not need it (I recognize the potential need to tweak the Star Wars movies for the high definition format. I just disagree with the tweaks George has chosen to make.)
 |
| Raping my childhood since Greedo shot first. |
These changes are known as "retcons", a shortening of "retroactive continuity". Now, you may ask, if I am not going to rant about Dan Didio and George Lucas, why do I bring up retcons at all? Well, you may wish to do one in your game.
This is not something you should consider lightly. A retcon should never be attempted unless it is absolutely necessary. A retcon involves editing or adding to a game's history and that is to me a very, very big deal.
There are different kinds of retcons. The least damaging is one where history is added to without contradicting known information. An excellent example of this where comics are concerned was a Spider Man story written by professional wrestler Raven. He penned a story about the wrestler Peter Parker had defeated that fateful night when his Uncle Ben had been murdered (I have not read the story but have been told it is a great read.). Nothing in the story contradicts what was written before. An excellent example of this where my Vindicators game is concerned was his post my fellow GM Rafe composed concerning vampires, and not the sparkling kind.
 |
| The face of regret, ladies and gentlemen. |
Another example of retconning is the alteration of known game facts, but said facts do not impact the game as a whole. In my games there was an organization known as the Six Families, magical clans. One of them was called the Fong-Kabayama. It was a lame name but at the time I did not see it as a high priority. It was an Asian clan and I did not have any immediate plans to use them, it existed for the purposes of fleshing out the game world. Only now I am running a new game, Behind The Veil, and it involves the magical community in a broader way and "Fong-Kabayama" simply does not cut it. So I changed the clan name to Golden Dragon and added more information without altering the information that had already been posted. It was a harmless alteration, it changed no past events.
Now we come to the sorts of retcons that make major alterations to the histories of properties. Excellent examples of this can be seen in Star Trek, The Next Generation, where the Klingons started out as joining the Federation, then later on writers decided to make the Klingons a separate empire again (A note: my friend, Dave Zyn, thought Star Trek producers Berman and Braga missed an excellent opportunity during the Enterprise television series. The show's primary subplot concerned a "temporal cold war", a conflict taking place between rival time travelers. Dave suggested every retcon seen in Star Trek could have been ascribed to the temporal cold war, where one side or the other was messing with the timeline to suit their purposes. Sadly Berman and Braga were pretty much just cashing a check at that point and did not seem interested in generating compelling storytelling or paying attention to inconvenient literary gaps in logic.). Another example is where a character has been killed but another writer brings them back (Sadly, Marvel and DC Comics both have been guilty of this on what is by now probably a hundred occasions.). It is these sorts of retcons that you have to be very careful of.
Sometimes a retcon may seem necessary, especially where real world events may impact your game. For example, author John Ringo has written a series of books about a retired Navy SEAL who killed Osama Bin Laden and collected the reward. Only now Osama Bin Laden is dead for real. So if John Ringo wishes to continue writing that series of books he is going to have to address real world events; either he says his character is still Bin Laden's killer (which in my opinion is disrespectful to the men who really did take him down) , or he says the man his character killed was someone else. So what we are seeing is how a real world event impacts a work of fiction.
So it might be necessary to tweak your game a bit if modern real world events impact a game that takes place in the future. However you can usually find that most events can simply be ignored where your game is concerned. Ten years on, 9/11 is just one more tragedy in a long, long line to most people not directly impacted by it, and in another ten years there will be a generation it hardly affected at all. No one ever talks about the Oklahoma City bombings any more, Timothy McVey is almost wholly unknown to anyone not living there or in Michigan. Same goes for the tragedies in Waco or Columbine. So for simplicity's sake, most modern events can be ignored. At worst you can simply say your game is taking place in an alternate timeline where it did not happen. After all, the Eugenics Wars never happened during the late twentieth century and that never stopped me from enjoying Star Trek re-runs. But perhaps you feel it necessary to incorporate real world events into your setting. If so do try to do so with a modicum of tact, if anything to spare the feelings of those who may have touched by the tragedies. Try not to exploit them.
So it might not be necessary to incorporate real world events into your game. What other reasons might a retcon be necessary? Perhaps there was a player meltdown and someone has quit. The break up was so acrimonious you want to wipe any trace of this player's character from your game. And let's say there has been a player involved in the game since the beginning, or at least years. And the two of you have had an epic falling out. Words were exchanged that cannot be taken back. He or she has gone, but he or she has left behind hundreds and hundreds of posts. So, what do you do?
Nothing. Nothing at all. He or she is gone, suck it up. Doesn't matter who was right or who was wrong. For the good of the game you accept the fact their contribution is there to stay, write their characters out in a fair and realistic manner, and then you move on. You do not pretend their character did not exist, you do not murder their character in some humiliating fashion. You do not write some massive vindictive post where a time traveler murders his character in his crib. Find a way to logically write their character out of the game, be mature about it. But for God's sake do not retcon them from existence!
So now let's say you have a great idea for an adventure, but the only problem is this pesky event happened five years ago that is in the way. So you have to ask yourself these questions: Is this really the only way you can accomplish the story you have in mind? How important is the event in question to the players? What are the long term consequences to your game's integrity? If any of these three questions give you pause, do not do the retcon!
If it seems that I am against major retcons you are right. I am against introducing new characters that are written as if they had always been. I am against extensive re-writes of canon history. I am against bringing dead characters back to life regardless of how much I like them. Greg Rucka may have written some great Captain America stories with Bucky not dying in that rocket crash, but at the cost of destroying a key component of Captain America's origin. Rucka creating a third Summers brother in X-Men, an entire team of X-Men no one ever heard of before? Pardon my french, but I call bullshit on that.
Now, that being said, I am not against a perceived retcon. In these cases it appears you have made dramatic changes but in reality it is not the case. For example, in my game Paragon died. What if Paragon resurfaces? Is it truly Paragon or an imposter? Is it Paragon from a parallel universe? What we can have here is a mystery the PCs need to solve.
Or is it Paragon time traveling a day before he dies? What are the implications if the PCs talk him out of going back? What we could see there is a possible retcon based on the actions of the PCs and even a potential Flashpoint (Warning: Spoilers!) situation. Still, I would be very, very careful before
So when it comes to retcons, think twice. If it is a minor thing then there is no harm. But if the consequences are potentially game wrecking, well, play it safe and don't pull a Lucas.
Friday, August 26, 2011
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Song of the week
I thought I would go a little old school this week. During the early eighties my exposure to music was greatly expanded by Mtv. To the youngsters out there, back then Mtv showed music videos all the time. Alternative programming was nonexistent and they had to show whatever they could get their hands on. For this reason the airplay was pretty amazingly eclectic, from early rap to heavy metal to alternative to classic rock. I had no idea a lot of these bands existed, and when I heard a song I had heard before I was able to actually discover the artist from the information Mtv provided in the lower left corner of the screen. Through Mtv I became a huge fan of acts like Van Halen and Queen.
Anyway, The Who's You Better You Bet was one of my favorite songs. Sadly I could not find an original version of the video I liked, but musically I thought this one sounded the best:
Anyway, The Who's You Better You Bet was one of my favorite songs. Sadly I could not find an original version of the video I liked, but musically I thought this one sounded the best:
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
An open call
I am putting out an invitation to those who might be interested in joining my games. The first is The Vindicators, which has been around since 2001. It is a stable, fun game with a fantastic group of players. The second game is Behind The Veil, which takes place in the same universe and has many of the same players. It is a magic based RPG and is just starting.
If you have any questions and/or are interested in joining, e-mail me at tstockel@rocketmail.com.
If you have any questions and/or are interested in joining, e-mail me at tstockel@rocketmail.com.
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Saturday, August 6, 2011
Bringing the funny
I am not a very funny person. I sometimes say something funny, but comedy is not something that comes easily to me, my attempts to bring the funny here at he blog notwithstanding. So I generally tend to avoid being funny in my adventures. But just because I am not very good at it does not mean that I have not tried to inject a little humor into my games.
I spoke in earlier posts regarding tone and it is important to be consistent, but sometimes a change in pace can prove to be refreshing for GM and players alike. Perhaps you have in mind a comedic adventure, or one of the PCs becomes the target of a practical joker. A new villain may appear who can be easily dismissed as a joke (i.e. DC's Riddler, for the most part.) or might be the catalyst for a fun adventure (Star Trek's Cyrano Jones). But if you want to try your hand at funny, you should bear a few things in mind:
A lot of humor is referential.
There was an episode of Bruce Timm's Batman, I think it was during that era when the animators of Superman took over duties so the character designs changed, where The Dark Knight was captured by Harley Quinn (not his finest hour, btw.) and tied upside-down over a tank full of piranhas. The Joker arrived and Harley explained the joke was the piranhas would look like they were grinning to Batman's perspective as they devoured him. The Joker was outraged, not only because he was upstaged by the sidekick (Batman tells Joker Harley had come closer to killing him than anyone else, Joker included) but because, as he explained it to Harley, the joke is not funny if you have to explain it.
If you have to explain to your players the mechanics of the joke before or afterwards, then it is not funny. I ran an adventure for one of my super hero games where the heroes were stranded on a mysterious island. The island held a variety of encounters inspired by the live action Sid and Marty Krofft television shows of the seventies and early eighties. Characters encountered sea monsters, came across smashed spacecraft with killer androids. A diminutive PC met humanoids with insect features much like herself whose enemy was a mad scientist with a shrinking ray, who had shrunken his wife and kept her in an old juke box behind his mansion. There was a feral woman with a beastly humanoid sidekick, a village whose inhabitants were enslaved with special hats by a witch and her wizard lover. There were also lizard men and ultimately they were going to meet a gold dragon with a Texan drawl.
So, what was the problem, you might ask? No one got it. Part of it was generational; many of my players were younger than me and did not see the same programs. Or they were from other countries where the program did not air. Or they just were not Krofft fans. So the jokes went completely over the heads of the players, and the adventure itself was not compelling enough to keep their attention. Now had I used a host of other enduring cartoon shows (i.e. Mighty Mouse) then perhaps the concept would have worked better. Imagine a smashed, rusted out green van dangling from tree vines, a haggard looking man in a red ascot and his two female companions, lonely survivors terrified of a savage beast lurking in the woods who, once it tasted the flesh of it's pal, now stalked them. The joke? You are expecting the dog to be the beast, when in reality it is Shaggy, perhaps mad with rabies.
Another example of failed comedy, you might ask? Years ago I was involved in play testing a game designed by my friend Dave, Zen and The Art of Mayhem, and I created a character named Kate Bushido. The idea was she was raised by monks who took to the teachings of Kate Bush's music, and consequently she could only speak using Kate Bush lyrics (And no, I could not rattle off lyrics off the top of my head. I made a list. An extensive list. Cataloged by situations my character might conceivably face. In retrospect the fact I went through all that trouble sounds so very sad.). Her martial arts style was also based on the titles of Kate Bush songs. Personally I thought it was hilarious. Everyone else? They humored me. On the other hand, Dave (not the guy who created the game, the one who follows this blog), created two characters whose names I will not mention here for potential legal purposes. One was a send-up of barbarian characters, essentially an indestructible idiot with a massive sword who always spoke of himself in third person. His other character was a redneck ninja. Dave was always funny when he played these characters and part of that was due to the fact that we got it. We knew who Conan (the barbarian, not the talk show host. Although someone playing Conan the barbarian looking like Conan O'Brien would be a hoot) the barbarian was, had all played Dungeons & Dragons. We knew what stereotypical rednecks were supposedly like as well as what ninjas were. Dave consistently brought the funny because he understood the target audience-his fellow players-and what made us laugh. When he described the redneck ninja's pickup truck squealing to a stop in a cloud of rust? Priceless.
Bring the funny, not the controversy.
Because players will come from a wide range of backgrounds and have varying tastes it is important to try to cater to as many as possible in order to keep them satisfied, and more importantly not offend or hurt their feelings. To that end where humor is concerned it is vitally important to consider the subject matter. For that reason there are some subjects you will want to avoid. The big ones are race and religion.
There is a film I love called Undercover Brother, it is a spoof of seventies blaxploitation films as well as calling out black stereotypes often seen in modern media, such as the angry black boss, or the smart black scientist wearing glasses (Which can be seen in the GI Joe cartoon series, Doc, who was a medic in the comic but since he was black and wore glasses cartoon writers immediately assumed he was a super smart scientist and wrote him accordingly. These are the same guys who turned master chef and articulate heavy weapons expert Roadblock into a jive talking rhymer.). My brother Jon considers the movie to be racist because all the bad guys are white...which is the point of the film because of what the is spoofing. In Blaxploitation the protagonists guys were always white, the bad guys almost always black (or a black man taking advantage of his people, usually a drug dealer. I think pimping was all right, though. I will have to finish watching Truck Turner one of these days to see how that plot ends). The point is, I think the film is funny because I think I get the jokes and Jon thinks it is racist because he does not. Is Undercover Brother racist? Maybe, a bit. But a lot of humor pushes the envelop and risks offending members of the audience.
So imagine you are running a game and your crew meets a race of aliens that have coal black skin and large white lips. You know, like this:
You might think it is funny because they are a send-up of how black people were portrayed in silent films. Perhaps you are even trying to be clever and there is no verbal language so everyone speaks with overly expressive facial features (i.e. comically hug eyes) and hand gestures. Or let's say you saw that episode of South Park where Kyle's cousin visits, the one who looks like a Jewish stereotype complete with curly hair, thick glasses, and is a hypochondriac. That was hilarious! You might say. I'm going to put a character like that in my game, everyone will love it! Please, please take this into account; Matt Stone and Trey Parker get lots of hate male, they alienate people all the time. And they can afford to alienate people. You as a GM cannot afford to alienate anyone with potentially controversial material, not only because you will lose players (and possibly friends), but you will also get a reputation as an insensitive racist bastard.
To a lesser extent, you might want to avoid political humor as well. Politics is often a divisive subject and Political humorists play to a specific audience, and like I said before regarding referential humor, if you use something regarding politics exclusive to your country some of your players might not get it. So that plot where the crew meets the Obomanians and their infamous health care system? Your heavy handed attempt at satire is not going to go over very well.
Keep it clean.
I will keep this brief: I do not get toilet humor. Chances are at least one of your players does not get toilet humor, too. So keep it out of your game, m'kay? Or if you feel you must insert it into your game, try your best to keep it as tactful as humanly possible and you must be confident that your players will get it. For example, in my Vindicators game one of the NPCs (really a PC, but the player has temporarily left the game), Xavious, a PC with x-ray vision, was in a meeting with two PCs and an NPC. One mentioned an NPC they wished to speak with:
"Has anyone checked on Little Big Gun? If she was out of the loop, she knows something's going on. You don't spend that much time in law enforcement and the military without developing a well-honed bullshit detector, and she probably thinks that the 'Baffler made me do it' story stinks as much as we do. If she isn't part of this, and I was in their shoes, dealing with a breakout at a prison for dangerous paranormals, I might take the opportunity to arrange an 'unfortunate accident'..."
"She is downstairs," Xavious said, staring at the floor, "One floor down, in the ladies-"
He turned away, "Awkward."
No details were needed beyond that. By the way, I would not have dared to use this joke in a new game, with players I did not know well. So if you are running a Star Trek game and have a joke regarding space toilets, you might want to re-think it.
Same goes for sex. I tend to run PG-13 games and avoid sexual situations in my adventures. You never know when someone shows a trace of prudishness.
Gee. No race, religion, politics, toilet humor or sex. What's left?
Time Bandits. If you have not seen this movie, see it now. Right now. Stop reading my blog and see this film. Netflix it, buy it, borrow it, download it online, I do not care how you do it, do yourself a favor and see how humor is done. The blog will still be here when you get back.
Back? Good. Where was I? Oh, yes. Violence. Violence for the sake of the funny can be a tricky subject to handle. Quite often violence is simply not funny. It is all a matter of context. If a game is based on horror or more realistic films then likely the violence is not going to be too humorous. For example, I did almost nothing about Saving Private Ryan funny, certainly not the horrors of war. However, I found the last Rambo film to be a hoot. Watching guys getting tossed a dozen yards from sniper shots, or Rambo decapitating the guy in the bed of the truck and then turning the machine gun on the guys in the cab, their blood splashing across the windshield? I giggled. Swear to God, I giggled. Still, pretty sure nothing is wrong with me. Pretty sure. But if the game is four color super heroic or a ridiculously over the top then violence for the sake of humor may very well be something all your players can get behind. I have not used much violence for the sake of humor in my games so it is hard for me to advise you how to use language to capture the tone you are looking for, and really some people might be a bit squeamish.
You see, that is the problem with humor that a lot of other genres do not have to worry about. When it comes to horror or romance a wide variety of people have the same triggers, respond to the same things in similar ways. Save for some exceptions romance and horror are apolitical, do not deal with religion or politics. But humor? Some people simply will not get it regardless of whether they were the target audience or not. Humor is something that is frustratingly indefinable.
Know when to leave the stage.
There was a Tex Avery cartoon where a wolf was hunting Droopy and his brothers in a parody of The Three Little Pigs, and he winds up getting bit in the ass by a bull dog (I highly recommend you watch the entire cartoon, but if you lack the time or inclination the point starts at the 5 minute mark and is about a minute long.):
The point is, any joke can get old. It is much more important to end a joke early rather than drag it out. "When is that?" you might ask. Hard to say. Every instance will be different. When in doubt, privately ask a player you trust what he or she might think.
Roasting should only apply to food.
I mentioned above the idea of the PCs being confronted by a practical joker, and perhaps a single player is being targeted. In cases like this you run the risk of making a players PC a laughingstock. No one likes to be laughed at, unless they are being roasted on television, and usually the pain is mitigated by a fat paycheck or the promise of rejuvenating one's sagging career.
I mentioned this incident before when my brother Donald ran a Dungeons & Dragons game. I was playing a half elf swashbuckler, partly because I am a huge fan of the Salkind Musketeer movies (If you ever get a chance to see these films, take it! They are the best adaptation of Dumas' Three Musketeers ever made) and I wanted to try something different. Donald never missed a chance to have NPCs say things like "Aren't all elves fags?" You know, because I was wearing a little lace and my character did not shave. The icing on the cake was when I discovered two other players were also playing half elves, but they looked more human than me. But hey, they laughed right along with Donald every time he said "fag" like they were the living embodiment of Beavis and Butthead. So Donald finally lost a player because he decided to make him-me-the weekly laughingstock.
Now don't think that a player should not sometimes be the focus of humor. The player might actually want to be. He or she may have designed her character to be ridiculous. If so cater to their desires provided it does not overly annoy the rest of the players or detract from the adventure. Just to be on the safe side, though, touch base with your players in private, find out how they feel. They may not be expressing their feelings, they may be volcanoes of repressed magmatic rage ready to explode at any time.
Huh. I had no idea "magmatic" was a word until I used it in a sentence. I was just trying to make a word up to be funny.
I know this article might not feel very helpful, all I have done is tell you what not to do more than tell you how to make your game funny. But I believe when it comes to gaming it pays to be a bit conservative.
No, not that kind of conservative. I mean, you want to play it safe. So if you decide to bring the funny, tread carefully.
I spoke in earlier posts regarding tone and it is important to be consistent, but sometimes a change in pace can prove to be refreshing for GM and players alike. Perhaps you have in mind a comedic adventure, or one of the PCs becomes the target of a practical joker. A new villain may appear who can be easily dismissed as a joke (i.e. DC's Riddler, for the most part.) or might be the catalyst for a fun adventure (Star Trek's Cyrano Jones). But if you want to try your hand at funny, you should bear a few things in mind:
A lot of humor is referential.
There was an episode of Bruce Timm's Batman, I think it was during that era when the animators of Superman took over duties so the character designs changed, where The Dark Knight was captured by Harley Quinn (not his finest hour, btw.) and tied upside-down over a tank full of piranhas. The Joker arrived and Harley explained the joke was the piranhas would look like they were grinning to Batman's perspective as they devoured him. The Joker was outraged, not only because he was upstaged by the sidekick (Batman tells Joker Harley had come closer to killing him than anyone else, Joker included) but because, as he explained it to Harley, the joke is not funny if you have to explain it.
If you have to explain to your players the mechanics of the joke before or afterwards, then it is not funny. I ran an adventure for one of my super hero games where the heroes were stranded on a mysterious island. The island held a variety of encounters inspired by the live action Sid and Marty Krofft television shows of the seventies and early eighties. Characters encountered sea monsters, came across smashed spacecraft with killer androids. A diminutive PC met humanoids with insect features much like herself whose enemy was a mad scientist with a shrinking ray, who had shrunken his wife and kept her in an old juke box behind his mansion. There was a feral woman with a beastly humanoid sidekick, a village whose inhabitants were enslaved with special hats by a witch and her wizard lover. There were also lizard men and ultimately they were going to meet a gold dragon with a Texan drawl.
 |
| Look, you had to be there. Being four years old helped. Or high. Or four years old and high. |
So, what was the problem, you might ask? No one got it. Part of it was generational; many of my players were younger than me and did not see the same programs. Or they were from other countries where the program did not air. Or they just were not Krofft fans. So the jokes went completely over the heads of the players, and the adventure itself was not compelling enough to keep their attention. Now had I used a host of other enduring cartoon shows (i.e. Mighty Mouse) then perhaps the concept would have worked better. Imagine a smashed, rusted out green van dangling from tree vines, a haggard looking man in a red ascot and his two female companions, lonely survivors terrified of a savage beast lurking in the woods who, once it tasted the flesh of it's pal, now stalked them. The joke? You are expecting the dog to be the beast, when in reality it is Shaggy, perhaps mad with rabies.
Another example of failed comedy, you might ask? Years ago I was involved in play testing a game designed by my friend Dave, Zen and The Art of Mayhem, and I created a character named Kate Bushido. The idea was she was raised by monks who took to the teachings of Kate Bush's music, and consequently she could only speak using Kate Bush lyrics (And no, I could not rattle off lyrics off the top of my head. I made a list. An extensive list. Cataloged by situations my character might conceivably face. In retrospect the fact I went through all that trouble sounds so very sad.). Her martial arts style was also based on the titles of Kate Bush songs. Personally I thought it was hilarious. Everyone else? They humored me. On the other hand, Dave (not the guy who created the game, the one who follows this blog), created two characters whose names I will not mention here for potential legal purposes. One was a send-up of barbarian characters, essentially an indestructible idiot with a massive sword who always spoke of himself in third person. His other character was a redneck ninja. Dave was always funny when he played these characters and part of that was due to the fact that we got it. We knew who Conan (the barbarian, not the talk show host. Although someone playing Conan the barbarian looking like Conan O'Brien would be a hoot) the barbarian was, had all played Dungeons & Dragons. We knew what stereotypical rednecks were supposedly like as well as what ninjas were. Dave consistently brought the funny because he understood the target audience-his fellow players-and what made us laugh. When he described the redneck ninja's pickup truck squealing to a stop in a cloud of rust? Priceless.
Bring the funny, not the controversy.
Because players will come from a wide range of backgrounds and have varying tastes it is important to try to cater to as many as possible in order to keep them satisfied, and more importantly not offend or hurt their feelings. To that end where humor is concerned it is vitally important to consider the subject matter. For that reason there are some subjects you will want to avoid. The big ones are race and religion.
There is a film I love called Undercover Brother, it is a spoof of seventies blaxploitation films as well as calling out black stereotypes often seen in modern media, such as the angry black boss, or the smart black scientist wearing glasses (Which can be seen in the GI Joe cartoon series, Doc, who was a medic in the comic but since he was black and wore glasses cartoon writers immediately assumed he was a super smart scientist and wrote him accordingly. These are the same guys who turned master chef and articulate heavy weapons expert Roadblock into a jive talking rhymer.). My brother Jon considers the movie to be racist because all the bad guys are white...which is the point of the film because of what the is spoofing. In Blaxploitation the protagonists guys were always white, the bad guys almost always black (or a black man taking advantage of his people, usually a drug dealer. I think pimping was all right, though. I will have to finish watching Truck Turner one of these days to see how that plot ends). The point is, I think the film is funny because I think I get the jokes and Jon thinks it is racist because he does not. Is Undercover Brother racist? Maybe, a bit. But a lot of humor pushes the envelop and risks offending members of the audience.
So imagine you are running a game and your crew meets a race of aliens that have coal black skin and large white lips. You know, like this:
To a lesser extent, you might want to avoid political humor as well. Politics is often a divisive subject and Political humorists play to a specific audience, and like I said before regarding referential humor, if you use something regarding politics exclusive to your country some of your players might not get it. So that plot where the crew meets the Obomanians and their infamous health care system? Your heavy handed attempt at satire is not going to go over very well.
Keep it clean.
I will keep this brief: I do not get toilet humor. Chances are at least one of your players does not get toilet humor, too. So keep it out of your game, m'kay? Or if you feel you must insert it into your game, try your best to keep it as tactful as humanly possible and you must be confident that your players will get it. For example, in my Vindicators game one of the NPCs (really a PC, but the player has temporarily left the game), Xavious, a PC with x-ray vision, was in a meeting with two PCs and an NPC. One mentioned an NPC they wished to speak with:
"Has anyone checked on Little Big Gun? If she was out of the loop, she knows something's going on. You don't spend that much time in law enforcement and the military without developing a well-honed bullshit detector, and she probably thinks that the 'Baffler made me do it' story stinks as much as we do. If she isn't part of this, and I was in their shoes, dealing with a breakout at a prison for dangerous paranormals, I might take the opportunity to arrange an 'unfortunate accident'..."
"She is downstairs," Xavious said, staring at the floor, "One floor down, in the ladies-"
He turned away, "Awkward."
No details were needed beyond that. By the way, I would not have dared to use this joke in a new game, with players I did not know well. So if you are running a Star Trek game and have a joke regarding space toilets, you might want to re-think it.
Same goes for sex. I tend to run PG-13 games and avoid sexual situations in my adventures. You never know when someone shows a trace of prudishness.
Gee. No race, religion, politics, toilet humor or sex. What's left?
 |
| Little things hitting each other. THAT'S WHAT I LIKE! |
Back? Good. Where was I? Oh, yes. Violence. Violence for the sake of the funny can be a tricky subject to handle. Quite often violence is simply not funny. It is all a matter of context. If a game is based on horror or more realistic films then likely the violence is not going to be too humorous. For example, I did almost nothing about Saving Private Ryan funny, certainly not the horrors of war. However, I found the last Rambo film to be a hoot. Watching guys getting tossed a dozen yards from sniper shots, or Rambo decapitating the guy in the bed of the truck and then turning the machine gun on the guys in the cab, their blood splashing across the windshield? I giggled. Swear to God, I giggled. Still, pretty sure nothing is wrong with me. Pretty sure. But if the game is four color super heroic or a ridiculously over the top then violence for the sake of humor may very well be something all your players can get behind. I have not used much violence for the sake of humor in my games so it is hard for me to advise you how to use language to capture the tone you are looking for, and really some people might be a bit squeamish.
You see, that is the problem with humor that a lot of other genres do not have to worry about. When it comes to horror or romance a wide variety of people have the same triggers, respond to the same things in similar ways. Save for some exceptions romance and horror are apolitical, do not deal with religion or politics. But humor? Some people simply will not get it regardless of whether they were the target audience or not. Humor is something that is frustratingly indefinable.
Know when to leave the stage.
There was a Tex Avery cartoon where a wolf was hunting Droopy and his brothers in a parody of The Three Little Pigs, and he winds up getting bit in the ass by a bull dog (I highly recommend you watch the entire cartoon, but if you lack the time or inclination the point starts at the 5 minute mark and is about a minute long.):
The point is, any joke can get old. It is much more important to end a joke early rather than drag it out. "When is that?" you might ask. Hard to say. Every instance will be different. When in doubt, privately ask a player you trust what he or she might think.
Roasting should only apply to food.
I mentioned above the idea of the PCs being confronted by a practical joker, and perhaps a single player is being targeted. In cases like this you run the risk of making a players PC a laughingstock. No one likes to be laughed at, unless they are being roasted on television, and usually the pain is mitigated by a fat paycheck or the promise of rejuvenating one's sagging career.
I mentioned this incident before when my brother Donald ran a Dungeons & Dragons game. I was playing a half elf swashbuckler, partly because I am a huge fan of the Salkind Musketeer movies (If you ever get a chance to see these films, take it! They are the best adaptation of Dumas' Three Musketeers ever made) and I wanted to try something different. Donald never missed a chance to have NPCs say things like "Aren't all elves fags?" You know, because I was wearing a little lace and my character did not shave. The icing on the cake was when I discovered two other players were also playing half elves, but they looked more human than me. But hey, they laughed right along with Donald every time he said "fag" like they were the living embodiment of Beavis and Butthead. So Donald finally lost a player because he decided to make him-me-the weekly laughingstock.
Now don't think that a player should not sometimes be the focus of humor. The player might actually want to be. He or she may have designed her character to be ridiculous. If so cater to their desires provided it does not overly annoy the rest of the players or detract from the adventure. Just to be on the safe side, though, touch base with your players in private, find out how they feel. They may not be expressing their feelings, they may be volcanoes of repressed magmatic rage ready to explode at any time.
Huh. I had no idea "magmatic" was a word until I used it in a sentence. I was just trying to make a word up to be funny.
I know this article might not feel very helpful, all I have done is tell you what not to do more than tell you how to make your game funny. But I believe when it comes to gaming it pays to be a bit conservative.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)